Nova Scotia Annotated Civil Procedure Rules
Part 8 - Counsel, Parties, and Claims
Rule 34 - Acting on One’s Own
Educational Notes
Self-represented litigants are restricted from communicating with represented parties, but the onus is not entirely clear. Rule 34.05 states only that counsel “may” direct a self-represented litigant to communicate only through counsel, which suggests that the default situation is the same as the current practice of no restriction. However, R.34.06 requires the prothonotary to advise all self-represented litigants that they may not communicate directly with a represented party unless they receive written permission from that party’s lawyer. Two or more parties who are all represented by counsel may still communicate directly, as there is no provision in R.34 to prevent it.
34.04 - Replacing agent
34.04 Replacing agent
(1) A corporation may replace its agent by filing a replacement of agent.
(2) The replacement of agent must contain the appointment, the same signature and information as the notice of appointment of agent, the names of the former agent and the replacement agent, and be entitled “Replacement of Agent”.
(3) The replacement of agent may be in Form 34.04.
Forms: Replacement of Agent (34.04)
- Agent, replacement
- Corporation acting on its own (SEE ALSO: Corporate party)
- Form 34.04, Replacement of Agent
- Replacement of Agent
- Replacement of Agent, Form 34.04
Annotations
The defendants brought a motion for summary judgment against the plaintiffs (two adults and their three children) in a residential tenancy matter. A preliminary issue involved the fact the court had previously allowed the plaintiffs' lawyer to withdraw despite the fact that Rule 36.07(5)(c) requires the infant plaintiffs to have representation. Held, action vis a vis the three infants stayed as of the moment counsel was permitted to withdraw, unless and until their litigation guardian (the mother) grants authority to a solicitor to act for them and a Notice of Change of Solicitor is filed with the court within approximately one year; should she fail to do, the application to dismiss infant plaintiffs' action will be heard. Wide latitude must be given where persons under disability are involved.
Full text: Flewelling v. Scotia Island Property Ltd. et al., 2009 NSSC 94